Skip to content
Jason, when a "theory" (like evolution) is directly opposed by a "law" (like the Second Law of Thermodynamics), it should be abandoned. In fact, it never should have been promoted from a "hypothesis" to a "theory" in the first place! The real reason it hasn't been abandoned is because it is the only way that atheists and secularists can explain the world around them without believing in the existence of God.
And speaking of "theory," scientists need to look at ALL the evidence ... and there's tons of evidence that refutes neo-Darwinism. If scientists won't even take into consideration any of that evidence, how can evolution be falsifiable? Isn't "falsifiability" one of the marks of the scientific method?
If anyone is ignorant, Jason, it's the evolutionists who are being willfully ignorant by ignoring any evidence that's critical of neo-Darwinism.
More information about formatting options
Copyright 2014 Creation Moments. All Rights Reserved.
August Ash, Inc. -
Minneapolis Web Design