Skip to content

Today's Creation Moment

Apr
16
Do the Bible and Science Mix?
John 3:12
“If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things.”
Scientific principles learned in the Bible have led to countless scientific discoveries and saved millions of lives. It’s true. Without the Bible, we would never have the blessings of modern science...
RSS

Reply to comment

*Application science is [repeatable testing=products for consumption] like vaccines, potable water and smores. This is in agreement with the Biblical mandate(s) to gain wisdoms discerning truths proverbs 8:9~ 9:4~ 9:10-"The fear of the Lord" is the beginning of wisdom, and knowledge of the Holy One is understanding. We get emperically verifiable results. It works or it doesn't.

*Historical science is [interprepation of fossils, sediments & starlight=opinion] like Nicholas Stenos' local floods depositing visible sedimentary layers: Nimrod, George Cuvier,~Charles Lyell condensing these views into something called uniformitarianism. Darwin reading Lyell on the Beagle voyage thus falling into the spell of Lyells' faulty theory of long epochs of time in which the present is key to the past. These imagined time spans gave Darwin license to inject natural selection over long periods to produce the variety of life we see in the present. We get legally supported [enforced] opinions fed by public dollars. Evolution in the classroom. Large legal fees for those who dissent. Or death.

These are the two approaches science has taken.
The first is dealing with the created order, reality.
The second is dealing with mans' corrupted opinion.

By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible. Hebrews 11:3

First of all you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. 2 Peter 3:3

"We need to act on theory alone, which is to say on prediction alone. It follows that the reputation of scientific prediction needs to be enhanced. But that can happen, paradoxically, only if they[scientists] disavow the certainty and precision that they[scientists] normally insist on. Above all we need to learn to act decisively to forestall predicted perils, even while KNOWING that they(predictions-natural selection, punctuated equalibrium) may never materialize. We must take action, in a manner of speaking to preserve our ignorance".
Jonathan Schell as quoted in Discover magazine 1987.

The following statement is from Dr. Stephen Schneider who famously claimed spray cans damage the atmospher(ozone).
"We have to offer up scary scenarios. make simplified dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we may have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest". WOW. I rest my case...

Martin A.
"Chief"

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options