Skip to content
Whales walking on land? Really? You have a fossil of what LOOKS like potential for limbs but absolutely no evidence of it actually doing so. So that one as 'proof' is out. Dino's with bird feathers. You found that on an artist's depiction? Yeah, real science. You really think cologin fibers are actually proto-feathers? That my friend is known as science fiction. You also failed to notice that even if all these were transitionals, you need a whole bunch more to make the theory work. You can list one fossil here, one fossil there. Those are sketchy at best. You need hundreds of thousands, if not millions. Evolutionists are famous for saying that it works on populations, not individuals. Yet when it comes to transitional fossils you only have individuals. Anyone can line up a pile of bones and say what they want about it. It doesn't mean a thing other than someone can line up a pile of bones.
A 'kind' would be close to a 'family' but if you try to apply the modern classification system to the Biblical classification system you are going to run into problems. And what we actually do observe is not a 'gain of genetic information' but a continual loss of genetic information.
DNA is one of evolution's worst enemies. It has information. The Law of Information is quite clear that it must come from an intelligent mind. Humans are 98% similar to chimps on the protein making parts of DNA. Got news for you. That's only 2% of the chain. If you want to claim 98% similarity, it needs to be 98% similarity throughout the whole thing. It is not. If you have the DNA that demonstrates dino evolution, you shoot yourself in the foot because DNA does not last more than 10,000 year regardless of preservation method.
What would convince me of transitions? Observation of evolution BETWEEN kinds. We only have observation of variation WITHIN kinds. Everything is imagination with no proof. Those fossils you claim to be evidence for evolution are the same fossils we use for Noah's Global Flood.
You need to learn where science starts and where it stops. It's clear you do not know the difference and with how the education system tends to work, I don't blame you. Bill Nye the "science master" just proved in his video against Creationism proved he doesn't know where it starts and where it stops. You need to learn what empirical evidence actually is and apply it to your own theory as you apply it to ours. If you hold your own theory to the scrutiny you hold to ours, you will find yours falls apart very quickly. I've seen the evidence for the transitional fossils. What is there is greatly lacking in demonstrating that they are legit transitional fossils and what is necessary for evolution to be true is simply not there.
More information about formatting options
Copyright 2014 Creation Moments. All Rights Reserved.
August Ash, Inc. -
Minneapolis Web Design