Skip to content

Today's Creation Moment

Sep
01
Unnatural Selection?
Luke 12:33
"Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth...
Just about every public school textbook once included the example of the peppered moth. The moth is used as a prime example of natural selection. Supposedly, as the trees in the English countryside...
RSS

Reply to comment

It's pretty obvious that when carbon dating methods don't get the results that evolutionists want, they feel free to call the results "unreliable." But if the results agree with assumptions they have, then the carbon dating method is supposed to be fool-proof. The fact of the matter is that carbon dating is a little bit of data and a lot of interpretation. Scientists interpret the data given parameters they have set up and assumptions they have made. And when, operating by their own rules, they find that their theories fail, suddenly carbon dating is at fault. It's the theory that's at fault, and the interpretation of the data. If I were interpreting data, I would corroborate it with written historical information. I wouldn't come up with wild theories that go against eye-witness testimony. Evolutionists can expect to be wrong about the age of the earth every time, and they will have to keep on revising it (as they are wont to do), because they base their entire theory on wishful thinking instead of historical fact.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options