Skip to content
It's pretty obvious that when carbon dating methods don't get the results that evolutionists want, they feel free to call the results "unreliable." But if the results agree with assumptions they have, then the carbon dating method is supposed to be fool-proof. The fact of the matter is that carbon dating is a little bit of data and a lot of interpretation. Scientists interpret the data given parameters they have set up and assumptions they have made. And when, operating by their own rules, they find that their theories fail, suddenly carbon dating is at fault. It's the theory that's at fault, and the interpretation of the data. If I were interpreting data, I would corroborate it with written historical information. I wouldn't come up with wild theories that go against eye-witness testimony. Evolutionists can expect to be wrong about the age of the earth every time, and they will have to keep on revising it (as they are wont to do), because they base their entire theory on wishful thinking instead of historical fact.
More information about formatting options
Copyright 2014 Creation Moments. All Rights Reserved.
August Ash, Inc. -
Minneapolis Web Design