Skip to content
So why should some fool (see Psalm 14:1) named Richard Dawkins be given a monopoly over the public use of that surname? Do you recommend that no one refer to Francis Schaeffer by his surname just because he has an apostate son who has the same surname? Why should atheists be given preferential treatment on the use of their surnames? (That's favoritistic discrimination.) Ever heard of George Harrison? To the ornithology community (FYI, I have taught ornithology at the college level), George Harrison is a birding expert (with a regular column in BIRDS & BLOOMS), but maybe you are a Beatles fan who wants to reserve a monopoly of that name for the same-named musician/evangelist who used his influence to promote psychedelic drugs and Eastern mysticism religion.
Actually, it is a breath of fresh air to see that someone with the surname "Dawkins" is a creationist with an earned doctorate who has practiced real-world science with a real-world science degree! Good for her! And shame on you for being so bigoted and discriminatory that you want to confiscate name-usage to favor atheist fools like Richard Dawkins. Due to government-funded programs (which already underwrite atheist propaganda), there is no need for private sector blogs (like Creation Moments) to give preferential treatment to atheist fools over real-world scientists like Dr. Karen Dawkins. If you want to know what real "bait and switch" is, check out <a href="http://www.icr.org/article/6538" title="www.icr.org/article/6538">www.icr.org/article/6538</a> and <a href="http://www.icr.org/article/6757" title="www.icr.org/article/6757">www.icr.org/article/6757</a> !
More information about formatting options
Copyright 2014 Creation Moments. All Rights Reserved.
August Ash, Inc. -
Minneapolis Web Design