Skip to content
I agree the Theory of Evolution fails to explain, even minimally how we came into being, or in fact how anything came into existence. There is no believable basis to accept how such things as information, intelligence or order exist in the universe. If the entropy of the universe is increasing as the second Law of Thermodynamics predicts, this implies we are in the process of moving from a more ordered state to a less ordered state. The obvious question then is how did the state of the universe ever become more ordered than it is now? Scientific theories require models to explain observable facts. These models contain pathways by which steps we can observe (or postulate) reasonable intermediate stages which themselves can be subject to critical discussion. In my humble opinion, Darwinism addresses these issues in a totally inadequate way. Darwinism fails to meet the criteria for a legitimate scientific theory espoused by Karl Popper over a century ago. The question becomes how can a theory claim legitimacy when it fails to meet the standard of explaining basic scientific facts?
More information about formatting options
Copyright 2014 Creation Moments. All Rights Reserved.
August Ash, Inc. -
Minneapolis Web Design