Skip to content
I actually haven't done too much research or kept to date on the evolution vs creation debate, but your comment intrigued me and I googled Archaeopteryx and as I was typing Google suggested adding hoax to the end of the search terms, which I did. One of the top results was this article (<a href="http://creation.com/archaeopteryx-unlike-archaeoraptor-is-not-a-hoax-it-is-a-true-bird-not-a-missing-link" title="http://creation.com/archaeopteryx-unlike-archaeoraptor-is-not-a-hoax-it-is-a-true-bird-not-a-missing-link">http://creation.com/archaeopteryx-unlike-archaeoraptor-is-not-a-hoax-it-...</a>) which references an interview with Dr. David Menton, who examined the Archaeopteryx and determined it to be a bird and much more similar to birds than anything else. See interview at: <a href="http://creation.com/bird-evolution-flies-out-the-window" title="http://creation.com/bird-evolution-flies-out-the-window">http://creation.com/bird-evolution-flies-out-the-window</a>. I would love to know if you had seen this before and your response to Dr. Menton. Thanks! (Disclaimer: I am a believer in Creationism.)
More information about formatting options
Copyright 2014 Creation Moments. All Rights Reserved.
August Ash, Inc. -
Minneapolis Web Design