Skip to content
You are aware that you just put yourself precisely where those interviewed stood BEFORE the interview took place. If evolution had any evidence, the 'experts' would have been able to pull something out that demonstrated a lot more of what evolution is than what they had. What has happened is these experts have lost sight of what science is. They know what the scientific method is, but they complete fail to see how Evolution actually does not come from studies through the scientific method. If you were actually honest, with the question Comfort asked, you'd be in the exact same boat as many of the students asked. You also demonstrate a lack of understanding of how the peer-review process works. You know the ideal, but that ideal has long been lost. Peer-review today is actually an elitist club where majority rule is applied. I know of many works and scientists that had their work rejected for the sole reason of putting Evolution into question. It is ruthless but not against false and flawed theories. If it was, Evolution would have been out the door many years ago.
More information about formatting options
Copyright 2014 Creation Moments. All Rights Reserved.
August Ash, Inc. -
Minneapolis Web Design