Skip to content
To answer your question, "If evolution had no evidence, why would the vastly overwhelming majority of scientists around the world accept it as fact?" obviously it's not about the evidence at all: it's about a belief. That is, a belief that God does not exist. Perhaps I should put that another way, that it is actually a rebellion against God in spite of (as God says) everyone really does know in their heart that God exists.
I have witnessed this bias in evolutionists myself, where I and others have presented clear disproofs of evolution, and that is dismissed and the evolutionist carries on. They carry on in spite of their position being disproven; in spite of the evidence against it. There is no other possible conclusion: they hold their position on the basis of a philosophical bias before examining the evidence. The bias is often dressed up to appear to be scientific, but you have given an example of this not being scientific yourself here. Science can never claim something has been absolutely proven true, that is, known to be "fact". Science can only absolutely disprove something. To claim something is proven fact goes beyond the realm of science.
More information about formatting options
Copyright 2014 Creation Moments. All Rights Reserved.
August Ash, Inc. -
Minneapolis Web Design